Janne Honkonen

Tech zone

Technical direction.
Architecture.
Delivery.

I design and build business systems end-to-end: architecture, integrations, security, performance, and operability. I’m strongest where the scope is complex and the cost of failure is real—systems that must stay reliable while requirements evolve.

View capabilities SCROLL Contact LINKS
Bias: operability • security • maintainability • remote-first
Systems map — use the tags to explore domains
interactive • content-driven
PRODUCT APIs SECURITY DATA/AI OPS INFRA domains → capability filters
selected domain

Product platforms

Architecture and operational thinking for systems teams can operate, extend, and trust without tribal knowledge.

  • Multiple generations of CMS and commerce platforms
  • Content models, workflows, permissions, governance
  • Interfaces designed for change, not rewrites
product
apis
ops
infra
security
data/ai
Architecture
boundaries, interfaces, ownership, change-cost
Operability
monitoring, recovery paths, predictable releases
Business scope
platforms, commerce, inventory, finance logic, integrations
Security
safer defaults, auditability, human-factor resilience

Capabilities

Technical scope built for reliability and change.

This page stays technical: platform architecture, operational engineering, security posture, and integration strategy—built to be maintainable and operable over time.

Architecture & boundaries

  • Define system boundaries, interfaces, ownership
  • Make tradeoffs explicit and revisitable
  • Reduce change-cost through structure

Platforms (CMS / commerce)

  • Multiple generations of CMS and webshop platforms
  • Workflow design: roles, permissions, governance
  • Designed to be operated, not babysat

Integrations & APIs

  • Contracts built for partner/version churn
  • Failure handling, idempotency, observability
  • Money-flow and business-rule heavy surfaces

Operational engineering

  • Predictable releases and rollback-friendly patterns
  • Monitoring, backups, hardening, recovery paths
  • Performance and capacity thinking as defaults

Security posture

  • Least privilege, auditability, incident readiness
  • Threat-aware design and safer operational patterns
  • Security awareness protocol design (authorized)

Data / automation / AI

  • Analytics/reporting that supports decisions
  • Automation to reduce toil and human error
  • Local model tooling used with clear limits

Operating model

How I run engineering work.

Clear boundaries, visible decisions, and systems that don’t depend on tribal knowledge. The output is stable delivery and calm operations.

Execution standards

  • Decision records for major tradeoffs
  • Review discipline and definition of done
  • Release patterns that support rollback and recovery
  • Observability as a default (logs/metrics/tracing mindset)
  • Documentation and runbooks so ownership scales

Team leverage (technical)

  • Make scope executable: slices, milestones, constraints
  • Remove bottlenecks and reduce context switching
  • Guardrails that prevent repeat incidents
  • Onboarding improved through system shape + docs
  • Complexity bounded through interfaces and ownership

Scope

Systems owned across product, operations, and money-flow.

I’ve built and operated systems where correctness and uptime matter: platforms that sell, market, track inventory, integrate with third parties, and move money. The point isn’t breadth for its own sake—it’s owning the full surface area that makes systems succeed in production.

Business-critical systems

  • CMS and commerce platforms (multiple generations)
  • PIM-style product information and workflow management
  • Customer systems, internal tooling, operational dashboards
  • Marketing delivery systems (email/SMS/campaign automation)
  • Inventory / warehousing / item bookkeeping workflows
  • Financial logic: payments, invoicing, reconciliation, distribution rules

Operational ownership

  • Integration layers: third-party APIs, versioning, failure modes
  • Security posture as a design input (not a checkbox)
  • Performance work that’s measurable, not speculative
  • Automation to reduce human error (deploys, backups, routines)
  • Edge/IoT systems: sensors, automation, resource-aware design
  • Knowledge systems that support continuity and onboarding

Delivery

Predictable delivery at team scale.

Ship safely, keep systems operable, and make change inexpensive. I optimize for clarity and feedback loops: small batches, observability, known failure modes, and recovery paths that don’t depend on a single person.

What you get

A technical lead who keeps delivery grounded in operations: clear boundaries, predictable releases, and systems that can be extended safely by others.

  • Boundaries, interfaces, and ownership that reduce change-cost.
  • Safe defaults, known failure modes, and recovery paths.
  • Monitoring + runbooks + incident learning loop.
  • Automation that increases consistency and reduces toil.
  • AI applied where it measurably improves throughput/quality.

Contact

Technical leadership, architecture, stabilization, delivery systems.

If you need someone who can drive technical direction and keep systems stable in production—reach out.

CVWEB Contact routesWEB GitHubGH LinkedInIN Visual profileWeb Main siteWeb